Chris MacFarland’s legacy with the Avalanche is shaping up to be complex. He stepped into the GM role at a high point, inheriting a Stanley Cup-winning team and immediately securing Nathan MacKinnon’s future in Colorado. That move alone was critical, given MacKinnon’s Hart Trophy-winning season and his status as the face of the franchise.
However, the Rantanen trade will likely define MacFarland’s tenure for years to come. Trading away an elite winger in his prime is never easy, especially when he’s been a cornerstone of the team alongside MacKinnon. While the salary cap played a major role, the decision suggests that MacFarland wasn’t confident they could re-sign Rantanen without long-term consequences.
It will ultimately come down to how Necas and Drury perform in Colorado. If Necas thrives in an expanded role and Drury develops into a key piece, MacFarland may be seen as a GM who made the tough but necessary decision to keep the team competitive. But if Rantanen continues to be elite while the Avalanche struggle, the trade could haunt his legacy.
Right now, MacFarland’s reputation hinges on whether this roster transition keeps the Avalanche in contention. What do you think—was this the right move, or did Colorado just take a step back?
Leave a Reply